2016-2017 Latino Immigrant National Election Study (LINES)

Listed in Datasets

By James A McCann1ORCID logo, Michael Jones-Correa2ORCID logo

1. Purdue University 2. The University of Pennsylvania

Three-wave panel survey of Latino immigrants in the United States. N=2,560. The first wave was fielded in the summer of 2016, the second during the presidential transition period, and the third in the summer of 2017.

Version 1.0 - published on 16 Sep 2021 doi:10.4231/HV45-GE64 - cite this Archived on 17 Oct 2021

Licensed under CC0 1.0 Universal

LINES.logo.jpg

Description

2016-2017 Latino Immigrant National Election Study (LINES)
PIs: James A. McCann and Michael Jones-Correa

Study Details

Sampling population

Foreign-born Latinos over eighteen; contact information obtained from marketing research firms.  For further details, see James A. McCann and Michael Jones-Correa, Holding Fast: Resilience and Civic Engagement Among Latino Immigrants (Russell Sage Foundation, 2020).

Survey design

The first survey wave was administered nationally by telephone to a representative sample (N=1,800).  Both cellular and landlines were called.  Nearly all interviews were in Spanish, by the respondent’s choice.

After the 2016 election, 576 immigrants took part in the second survey wave, which was fielded during the presidential transition period (November 8, 2016 – January 20, 2021, a 32 percent re-contact rate).  At this time, an additional fresh sample of 260 Latino immigrants was added to the study using the same sampling procedures as the first wave.

In the summer of 2017 (July through early-September), a third wave was conducted, with all 1,800 immigrants from the pre-election baseline survey being eligible for interviewing. In this period, 31 percent of these immigrants (N=554) were surveyed; this includes 321 respondents who had taken part in the second wave and 233 who had not.   In addition to these respondents, 500 fresh immigrants were sampled using the same procedures as the first wave.  In total, 2,560 immigrants took part in the 2016-17 LINES.

AAPOR response rates

RR 1 = .034 (pre-election); .020 (post-election transition); .032 (summer of 2017). 

COOP 4 = .239 (pre-election); 253 (post-election transition); .296 (summer of 2017).

Weighting

Distributions of socio-demographic variables were compared to the American Community Survey (ACS).  In most respects, the LINES sample conformed to the ACS, though significant discrepancies were found for education, age, gender, and citizenship status.  Weighting values were calculated based on these variables through iterative proportional fitting (“raking”).  These values are given in the variable “weight.”

Support

Russell Sage Foundation; Purdue University; Cornell University; University of Pennsylvania.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

Tags

The Purdue University Research Repository (PURR) is a university core research facility provided by the Purdue University Libraries and the Office of the Executive Vice President for Research and Partnerships, with support from additional campus partners.
In accordance with Purdue policies, all persons have equal access to Purdue University’s educational programs, services and activities, without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, genetic information, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, disability or status as a veteran. See Purdue’s Nondiscrimination Policy Statement. If you have any questions or concerns regarding these policies, please contact the Office of the Vice President for Ethics and Compliance at vpec@purdue.edu or 765-494-5830.