In 1996, the Rough Cilicia Survey Project (RCSP) obtained permission from the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Department of Cultural Heritage and Monuments, to investigate a 60 km coastal strip in southern Turkey, what is commonly referred to as Western Rough Cilicia. In modern terms the RCSP area rested within the confines of two provinces (Antalya and Icel) encompassing three districts (Alanya, Gazipaşa, and Kaledran). Field seasons in Gazipaşa continued until 2011, with study seasons in the Alanya Archaeological Museum still on going. To obtain a balanced appraisal of the urbanization of western Rough Cilicia, the RCSP survey team monitored evidence for relationships of cultural reception in the region within the context of world system theory. More precisely, we asked whether or not native elites so assimilated Greco-Roman cultural attributes that their own attributes essentially merged with and became indistinguishable from these. Toward this end, team investigators examined the archaeological remains of western Rough Cilicia with the highest degree of sensitivity possible, one capable of detecting relatively subtle distinctions in the native experience of this remote region during Roman times.
During the course of thirteen field seasons (1996-2005, 2007-08, 2011) the RCSP survey team employed a multi-phased process of archaeological inspection that included pedestrian survey of urban and rural terrain, architectural mapping of surviving features, ceramics collections, geological survey, remote sensing of existing land cover, and maritime survey. All data was geo-referenced for mounting in project GIS.
The Project Director was Nicholas Rauh (Purdue University). The Field Directors were, in 1996-1997 Richard Blanton (Purdue University), in 1998-2002 Luann Wandsnider (U. of Nebraska at Lincoln), and from 2003-2011, Nicholas Rauh. The Architectural Mapping Team consisted of Rhys Townsend (Clark U.), Michael Hoff (U. Nebraska at Lincoln), and in 1996 Jennifer Tobin (U. Illinois at Chicago). The Geology Team included Sancar Ozaner (TUBITAK), Hulya Caner (U. of Istanbul), Timothy Filley (Purdue U.), Martin Doyle (Duke U.), Lawrence Theller (Purdue U.), and Unal Akkemik (U. of Istanbul). The Underwater Survey Team (2003-2004) was directed by Cheryl Ward (Florida State U.). The RCSP Pottery team consisted of Nicholas Rauh, Richard Rothaus (St. Cloud State U.), Matthew Dillon (Loyola Marymount U.), Caroline Autret (U.Paris-Sorbonne), and Asena Kizilarslanoglu (Kastamonu U.). Mette Korsholm (David Collection, Copenhagen) curated the project’s small finds. Christopher Dore (U. of Arizona) and Edward Connor (Mass. Dept. of Water Conservation and Recreation) conducted remote sensing of existing land cover. Data Processing and assemblage of this archive was facilitated by Stanislav Pejša (Purdue U.) and Maxwell Black (Camby IN). Scores of students have participated in the processing, photography, scanning, and illustration of this data, both in the field in Gazipaşa and at Purdue University.
The project was funded three times by the US National Science Foundation (1996, 2000, 2003), twice by the National Geographic Society (2004, 2011), once by the American Research Institute in Turkey (1999), and recurrently by participating universities.
The Rough Cilicia Survey Project Study Collection was created by Richard M. Rothaus of St. Cloud State U. in 1997. The purpose was to bring order to the large scale grab collections being processed by the survey team in 1996-97. The process of selection for the Study Collection is described in the accompanying publication N. K. Rauh and R. Rothaus, “Caveat Emptor: Collecting and Processing Pottery in Western Rough Cilicia?” Old Pottery in a New Century. Innovating Perspectives on Roman Pottery Studies, ed. J. Lund, J. Poblome, D. Malfitana, Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2006, pp. 347-362.Organizing the collection according to "Rothaus Numbers," Richard assembled most of the Study Collection from the ceramics grab collections that the team assembled at the large urban sites along the coast (Laertes, Iotape, Selinus, Kestros, Nephelion, and Antiochia ad Cragum). Drawings were commenced by Ankara University student, Betul Sahin, and descriptions by Jason DeBlock and Nicholas Rauh of Purdue University. At the end of the 1997 season, Kathleen W. Slane of the University of Missouri at Columbia visited the survey headquarters to review the work and made some valuable additions, revisions, and emendations. Since its inception the RCSP Study Collection has been safely stored in the Alanya Archaeological Museum. We express our gratitude to Ismail Karamut and Seher Turkmen of the Alanya Museum for their long-standing support of the project.
The survey team has relied on the Study Collection to identify ceramic materials encountered in the field. From 1999 – 2011, Rauh, team collaborator Matthew Dillon of Loyola Marymount U., and numerous student participants devoted countless hours photographing, measuring, Munselling, revising, and conserving the collection. Rothaus revisited the survey in 2001, and incorporated several new forms into the collection. That season E. Lyding Will of U. Massachusetts at Amherst also made important contributions to our understanding of the amphora remains. John Lund and Tamar Hodos also visited briefly and offered important recommendations. Kim Leaman of Purdue University spent several seasons revising and expanding our set of profile drawings. Most of the drawings in the collection are Leaman’s, in fact. In 2005, Rothaus made one final visit to the survey and added several new items to the collection from the survey materials of the Adanda Canyon and Bickici Highland phase of the survey (2000-2004). He was assisted by illustrator Burhan Süer from Bilkent U. in Ankara. In 2008 Caroline Autret of the U. Paris-Sorbonne, joined the team and greatly enhanced our understanding of locally produced amphoras. Since 2015, H. Asena Kızılarslanoğlu of Ahí Evran University in Kırşehir has worked diligently with Rauh to complete the profile drawings. In addition, dozens of Purdue University undergraduate students have also spent years scanning the photographic images and profile drawings seen here.
The collection consisting of some 339 sherds representing 190 identified forms. Each item furnishes ceramic classification, typology and form identification, approximate use chronology, detailed find location (including coordinates), sherd and fabric descriptions, measurements, Munsell coloration, images, and profile drawing. For imported and locally produced wares that were wide distributed, we furnish published comparanda where possible. An attached Code Book defines all the column headings; the attached article Caveat Emptor: Collecting and Processing Pottery in Western Rough Cilicia? (sc_caveat_emptor.pdf) explains the selection process for the Study Collection and the portfolio of ceramics processing methodologies we employed in the field.
There are no comments on this entry.